2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Nissan Juke
Compact SUVs are a favorite choice among drivers due to their high fuel economy and easy handling while still offering needed utility. Since they are so popular, most brands offer at least one—if not more—model to choose from. This can make the buying process incredibly challenging for drivers. We are here to help make things easier by presenting a comparison of the 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Nissan Juke.
The 2016 Mazda CX-3 is about six inches longer than the 2016 Nissan Juke. Thanks to this extra length, the 2016 Mazda CX-3 offers a larger maximum cargo volume of 44 cubic feet when the rear seats are collapsed. If all of the seats are needed to accommodate passengers (maximum of five), the 2016 Mazda CX-3 still offers a 12-foot cargo volume.
|2016 Mazda CX-3||VS||2016 Nissan Juke|
|SKYACTIV®-G 2.0L DOHC 4-cylinder with VVT||Engine||1.6L Direct Injection Gasoline (DIG) Turbo 4-cylinder|
|29 mpg city, 35 mpg highway||Fuel Economy||28 mpg city, 34 mpg highway|
|44 cubic feet||Max. Cargo Volume||35 cubic feet|
2016 Mazda CX-3 Engine Power
Drivers love the engine that is paired with the 2016 Mazda CX-3, which is a SKYACTIV®-G 2.0L DOHC 4-cylinder with VVT. Thanks to the SKYACTIV® technology developed by Mazda, this 146 horsepower engine is able to reach 29 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway.
The engine is paired with a SKYACTIV®-Drive 6-Speed automatic transmission with manual-shift and Sport mode, which allows for a smooth and sporty ride.
One of the top reasons why drivers choose a compact crossover is because many models—including the 2016 Mazda CX-3—are available with all-wheel drive. Thanks to additional power and traction provided by this drivetrain, drivers are able to handle snow-covered roads more easily and with confidence.
If you are interested in learning more about the 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Nissan Juke comparison, please contact a sales professional from Royal South Mazda.