|2016 Mazda CX-3||2016 Honda HR-V|
|29 City/35 Hwy||Fuel Economy||28 City/35 Hwy|
|12.4 cu-ft.||Cargo Volume||23.2 cu-ft.|
2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Honda HR-V
Compact crossover vehicles have a lot to offer. They are small vehicles that are efficient, but at the same time they are surprisingly capable. When comparing the 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs the 2016 Honda HR-V, we find that both have plenty to offer, but there are a few other features and specs offered by the CX-3 that we find more appealing, especially the level of power and efficiency that the Mazda crossover has to offer.
Drivers will also appreciate the cost and the standard features offered by the Mazda. With a six-speaker audio system, Bluetooth, the Mazda Connect infotainment system and AC with a pollen filter there are many different features that the CX-3 offers that increase comfort and convenience for the driver and the passengers. The Mazda vehicle also offers options for different wheel sizes and roof rack attachments thanks to different packages that are available for the vehicle.
The Mazda CX-3 in Bloomington
The Mazda CX-3 not only offers quite a bit in terms of features and cost, it is also capable. The crossover comes with a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 146 horsepower and 146 pound-feet of torque. Both of which exceed the capability of the HR-V. The engine is paired with a six-speed automatic transmission. Each trim also comes with the option for all-wheel drive, which does little to reduce the overall level of fuel efficient.
The CX-3 finishes off the full package with a few safety features. It doesn’t just offer advanced airbags and three-point seatbelts, you’ll also find a tire pressure monitoring system, an engine immobilizer and a fold-away brake pedal assembly. The Mazda as a whole is one of the best available options for a driver that is looking for space, capability and plenty of features. For more information you can view our available inventory online.